Rahul Ghandy Real Face Exposed in USA – Fear mongering through Lies/Fake/Fraud
During his ongoing visit to the US, Rahul Ghandy (RG) is hell bent upon proving his mentor Sam Pitroda(aka Satyanarayan Gangaram Pitroda of Gujarat lineage) wrong by his disparaging remarks on a variety of subjects like politics, economy and technology.
Quite paradoxical and ironic Sam Pitroda is commendation that “RG has a vision contrary to what BJP promotes by spending crore rupees. I must tell you, he is no Pappu. He is highly educated, well-read; a strategist with deep thinking on any subject and sometimes it is not very easy to understand him.”
On in-depth reflection, RGs focus remains simple: Divide on ethnic, caste and communal lines to somehow grab power earliest, if not after 2029, to rule India. The remarks that Sikhs may not be allowed to wear the “Turban and Kada”, has been condemned as “fear mongering” by his rivals. But, it proves RGs focus on “Divide and Rule” on communal lines. Add to it, his thrust on “Caste Census” which if it is genuinely implemented in the political arena; RG will need to abandon his PM dream. Be that as it may, their fallout will be “Disintegration of India”. No illusions on outcomes.
In retrospect, by spreading lies and disinformation, RG has confirmed that he is “Pappu Incarnated” and a congenital liar. Let me highlight facts (if any) and lies/fiction/fake news of RGs statements. First, RG must shed/abandon the “Gandhi” suffix. His grandfather Feroz Shah Jehangir Ghandy was a Parsi. His grandmother, at best, can claim to be Indira Nehru. RG was born to Sonia Ghandy (née Maino) who was raised in a Roman Catholic family in Italy. Yet another lie is RGs janeu-dhari Hindu claim (the one who wears Brahminical thread) in 2017. Subsequently in August 2022, on being initiated into the Lingayat sect, RG cannot wear Janeu as the members of the Lingayat community do not wear it. Most importantly, RG's Cambridge Certificate says his name is Raul Vinci. IF RG claims to be honest, he must shed the suffix “Gandhi” and own up as “Ghandy”.
RG stated that Bharat Jodo Yatra reshaped his political views by incorporating the “idea of love, respect, and humility” as key values essential to Indian politics. Surely, highly educated people with idealistic views should not be invoking choicest names to decry political rivals. By invoking such platitudes, RG is confirming the proverb “nau sau chuuhe khake billi hajj ko chalii”.
Irrefutable Fact - RG called Modi “Chor”. And, he allowed his cronies to invoke slanderous names for Modi like Bhasmasur by Jairam Ramesh, Ravan by Digvijay Singh, Snake, scorpion, dirty old man/ Gandi Naali ka Keeda by Mani Shankar Aiyar), compulsive liar and encounter chief minister by P Chidamabaram, most recent “Scorpion on Shiivling” by Shashi Tharoor among many others. If they are to be viewed as the “idea of love, respect and humility”, the likes of Sam Pitroda and other stooges/sycophants must get checked for intellectual honesty and probity. Of course, RGs mother set the tone by labeling Modi as “Maut ka Saudagar”,
Add to it, RG statement concerning his responsibility as LoP, that is, to hold the government accountable and prevent them from running a "dictatorship" in parliament. His barb that within minutes of the election result, nobody in India was scared of the BJP or Prime Minister” is a veiled attempt to portray Modi as a dictator. In retrospect, RG did not hesitate to decry/denigrate the present state of democracy on foreign land. Does not RG realize that such derogatory views offer an opportunity to other nations and organizations to seize and exploit them to malign modern India?
Next, RG statement on the RSS and the BJP exposes his hatred towards them as political rivals. Surely, it is contrary to his “idea of love, respect and humility”. RG stated that the difference in the idea of India between the RSS and the Congress party - RSS believes that India is one idea and we believe that India is a multiplicity of ideas and we believe that everybody should be allowed to participate. RG stated “What the RSS says is that certain states are inferior to other states. Certain languages are inferior to other languages, certain religions are inferior to other religions, and certain communities are inferior to other communities...All the state has its history, tradition...RSS ideology is Tamil, Marathi, Bengali, Manipuri, these are inferior languages...that's what the fight is about...These people (RSS) don't understand India..." Surely, it is yet another veiled attempt to drive wedge on ethnic, racial and communal lines.
RG appears to suffer from a blinkered view of modern India’s history and turns a blind eye to its 1947 lessons of horrendous communal partition. Both RG and his mentor uncle Sam Pitroda must understand and appreciate that “Demographics is destiny” of nations. And, they have already undergone massive changes particularly in West Bengal and Assam.
Never too late for RG and his mentor Sam Pitroda also to realize that Al Qaeda may be down and out of Afghanistan and ISIS may be down and out of Iraq and Syria, but their global resurgence, particularly in South Asia, remains a horror prospect. Under the tutelage of Pakistan’s ISI and radical Islamist Terrorist Organizations, the indigenous radical Islamist groups are rallying to emerge as the most potent internal security threat. Their end objective is to establish the Islamic Caliphate and restore primacy of Muslim religion. And, the rapidly changing demographics projected by 2500 AD provide an opportunity to raise their ugly head all over again. What more, when they do not believe in “the idea of love, respect and humility” – hate Hindus as Kafirs?
RG also defined three major challenges faced by the West and India: unemployment, education and technology. Whilst doing so, RG stated that China and Vietnam do not face unemployment. He praised China for its dominant position in global production, a change that Gandhi attributes to the Western and Indian withdrawal from manufacturing. The United States in the 1940s, 50s and 60s was the centre of global production. The West, America, Europe, and India gave up on the idea of production and largely abandoned the manufacturing sector, leaving it to countries like China and Vietnam.
Comparing China under a single party rule, more aptly dictatorship (only 5-leaders as Presidents in nearly 75-years), with democracies with Congress Party opposing all economic reform initiatives, is quite absurd.
RG has also exposed himself as a “first rate liar” by stating that China and Vietnam do not face unemployment. According to World Bank data, India’s youth unemployment rate (for ages 15-24) stood at 18% and China fared little better at 15.9%. With China, the problem isn’t just the lack of jobs – growing automation is quickly replacing human labor, a situation made worse by its universities churning out millions of graduates every year.
Most importantly, a number of variables need to be considered whilst making comparisons between China and India and decrying India. Key variables include: “area, population, natural resources, political order, economy, technology etc.” And, Sam Pitroda should have briefed that China’s area is 3-times larger than India and its natural resources have not been looted like the ones in India during the Congress Party regime. Also, India’s population has overtaken China as per “WorldoMeter”.
Deng Xiaoping’s (Post Mao Era) 4-Great Modernizations initiative and the geo-politics resulted in a forward push to the Chinese economy to reach its present state.
Yet another significant factor is the demographic bulge of India, particularly due to illegal migrations and skewed population growth rates favoring Muslims. In particular, who is responsible for illegal migrations to dramatically alter demographics in West Bengal and Assam? De Jure, they are the root cause for unemployment. After all, the land bearing capacity is finite only. Historically viewed, the responsibility for demographic explosion rests squarely on the Congress Party. When viewed in a long term strategic context, it will be the most critical security strategic challenge to overcome.
Doesn’t RG, the so-called intellectual, realize that unemployment is squarely linked to demographic explosion? And, the blame for the same squarely rests on the Congress Party’s failure to counter it in the early decades of 1950s to 1990s. Add to it, the Congress Party “License Raj” in the name of democracy and pseudo socialism for the first over 40-years. Furthermore “Corruption” engulfed India as the most sinister internal security threat. Only in the early 1990’s under P V Narasimha Rao an attempt was made to open the economy, but in a limited manner. Now, RG and the I.N.D.I Alliance partners are stonewalling key economic reform initiatives of the Modi led NDA regime.
RG sermons on economy and leadership are “no Eureka”. For example, there is nothing new about “the act of production and organizing production creates jobs. Therefore, the requirement is to enhance production capabilities.” Gandhi argued that India needs to rethink its approach to manufacturing and align it with democratic principles thereby addressing the unemployment crisis and adapting to the changing global economic landscape. Otherwise, you're going to see massive social problems coming in India and in the United States and Europe. The polarization of our politics is because of this..."
On leadership, RG stated "Listening is much more important than speaking...Listening is fundamental to understanding people...You don’t raise every issue but focus on addressing the fundamental ones. You choose your battles much more carefully...." He also emphasized the significance of carefully selecting one's battles and focusing on addressing the fundamental issues rather than raising every single concern. No Eureka!
RG further elaborated on his approach to dealing with complex issues, stating that he tries to comprehend the nuances and intricacies before planning his day accordingly. He described the parliamentary sessions as a "war of ideas and words," where the opposition attempts to present their viewpoint while the government tries to suppress it. Who is to be blamed for stalling the proceedings in the Parliament followed by walking out and protesting outside the Parliament?
On education, RG stated that “Our education system doesn’t connect with the business system. You have a business system operating independently, and then you have an education system that exists in an ivory tower. RGs sermon that “Many people say that India has a problem with skills. I don’t think India has a problem with skills. I think India has a problem with respect for skills. India does not have respect for people who possess skills. In retrospect, RG must first “Practice what he is preaching” on almost all counts. Who is responsible for allowing the “Babu type Colonial education system” for the past over 50-years of early period of independence? Once again, it is the Congress Party. He called for better integration between education and vocational training. Regarding Artificial Intelligence, Gandhi acknowledged its potential to both displace and create jobs, urging thoughtful management of its impact. NO EUREKA!
When viewed from RGs from past foreign visits, RG is known for denigrating India’s image based on the Colonial mindset of “Divide and Rule”. For example, during his visit to London in 2023, RG denounced the fundamental institutions of India and its democracy in his address at the Cambridge University: "The institutional framework which is required for democracy -- Parliament, free press, and the judiciary, just the idea of mobilization, and moving around all are getting constrained. So, we are facing an attack on the basic structure of Indian democracy." He stated that Indian democracy is under pressure and opposition voices are being stifled.
RG must understand that there are deeper intellectual, political and moral implications of damning India’s legal system, especially the Supreme Court and the Election Commission, and insinuating there is no free press in the country. RG took the route to fundamentally demonize and discredit the NDA government and PM Modi by denouncing these three pillars of democracy. Only then does the de-legitimization of the incumbent political order acquire real substance.
Most importantly, RG must understand that the denunciation of India’s basic institutions has a wider and deeper connotation that is potentially dangerous. Such sentiments instantly vindicate separatist movements in India that are asserting that basic human and democratic rights are absent in the country.
Remember also that separatists are legitimately claiming that only permitting secession will accord them rights that are universally recognized as a precondition for the legitimacy of a state. This is what Khalistanis proclaim and the banned organization, Sikhs for Justice articulates and broadcasts with some nuance, surpassing any sophisticated responses from the Indian authorities.
As per established norms, political leaders refrain from passing adverse remarks on the country’s situation. For example, Indira Gandhi declined to comment on India while she was abroad when questioned by an interviewer. Her stance might be taken as a salutary warning for Indian politicians to avoid decrying.
The way and tenor of RG’s speeches during election rallies and also in the Parliament clearly exposes his character – Arrogance Personified. Best example is RG tearing the Ordinance for 3-months protection from disqualification in 2013 tabled by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in the Parliament. His bombastic claim to “Truth” falls flat by his “Chameleon” like changes best suited to political situations.
Finally, RG must first legally emerge clean on issues like citizenship, National Herald case and the rape case. Kishore Samrite, a former Samajwadi Party MLA from Madhya Pradesh, had in a petition filed before the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court, alleged that Sukanya Singh, 24, and her parents had been “untraceable” since January 2007, barely two weeks after RG and his five “foreigner friends” had allegedly sexually assaulted Sukanya. RG was also allegedly involved in suicide of Ajit Jogi's daughter. Are the rape allegations against Rahul Gandhi in Sukanya and Anusha case true?
To sum up, RG is desperate to reclaim the PMs Chair by “hook or crook” and “Divide and Rule” as his entitlement. Ironic that RGs high-decibel and angry outbursts and fear mongering and fraud news dissemination on foreign lands are hailed by his cronies and camp followers. Also, it is ironic that none of the self styled intellectuals and media channels fail to carry out unbiased and unprejudiced character/personality appraisal of RG – the “Yuv Raj” and Prince-charming in Waiting.
0 Comments